Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Respir J ; 57(4)2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303540

RESUMO

The long-term pulmonary outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unknown. We aimed to describe self-reported dyspnoea, quality of life, pulmonary function and chest computed tomography (CT) findings 3 months following hospital admission for COVID-19. We hypothesised outcomes to be inferior for patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), compared with non-ICU patients.Discharged COVID-19 patients from six Norwegian hospitals were enrolled consecutively in a prospective cohort study. The current report describes the first 103 participants, including 15 ICU patients. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale, the EuroQol Group's questionnaire, spirometry, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO), 6-min walk test, pulse oximetry and low-dose CT scan were performed 3 months after discharge.mMRC score was >0 in 54% and >1 in 19% of the participants. The median (25th-75th percentile) forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were 94% (76-121%) and 92% (84-106%) of predicted, respectively. D LCO was below the lower limit of normal in 24% of participants. Ground-glass opacities (GGO) with >10% distribution in at least one of four pulmonary zones were present in 25% of participants, while 19% had parenchymal bands on chest CT. ICU survivors had similar dyspnoea scores and pulmonary function as non-ICU patients, but higher prevalence of GGO (adjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.1-15.6) and lower performance in usual activities.3 months after admission for COVID-19, one-fourth of the participants had chest CT opacities and reduced diffusing capacity. Admission to ICU was associated with pathological CT findings. This was not reflected in increased dyspnoea or impaired lung function.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Qualidade de Vida , Dispneia , Hospitais , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 140(13)2020 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês, Norueguês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998485

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fever in combination with a rash is a presentation regularly seen in medicine. The causes clinicians must consider include infections, medications, autoimmune diseases. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy young woman presented with a 3 to 4 day history of fever, headache and a maculopapular rash that also affected her palms. She was in a stable condition and was admitted for observation and further investigations without initiating antibiotic treatment. During the next two days her condition improved spontaneously, and her symptoms were initially interpreted as a viral infection. On day 3, blood cultures taken on the day of admission came back positive for Streptobacillus moniliformis, the causative agent of rat-bite fever. A more detailed patient history was taken, and the patient reported that she had several pet rats and one of them had given her some superficial scratches a few days before she fell ill. INTERPRETATION: Rats and other rodents are often colonised by Streptobacillus moniliformis in their oropharynx. Many people keep such animals as pets, and it is important to be aware of this disease as a differential diagnosis when a patient presents with fever and rash. Untreated, the disease might have a fatal course and the treatment of choice, penicillin, is usually easily available.


Assuntos
Exantema , Febre por Mordedura de Rato , Streptobacillus , Animais , Exantema/diagnóstico , Exantema/etiologia , Feminino , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Febre por Mordedura de Rato/complicações , Febre por Mordedura de Rato/diagnóstico , Febre por Mordedura de Rato/tratamento farmacológico , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA